Herald SUrSHPU
The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University ЧГПУ

ISSN: 2618–9682; ISSN 1997-9886
Impact factor RSCI: 0,312

BACK TO ISSUE CONTENT | HERALD OF CSPU 2022 № 5 (171) Pedagogical sciences
SHOW FULL TEXT (IN RUSSIAN)
SHOW IN eLibrary
DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2022.171.5.010
UDC: 371.263
BBC: 74.202.8
D. G. Timerkhanov ORCID
Director, Municipal budgetary educational institution «High school №1 Chelyabinsk city», Chelyabinsk, Russia
E-mail: Send an e-mail
I. I. Katsay ORCID
Deputy Director for Scientific and Methodical Work, Municipal budgetary educational institution «High school №1 Chelyabinsk city», Chelyabinsk, Russia
E-mail: Send an e-mail
TECHNOLOGY OF MULTILEVEL LEARNING BASED ON AN ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
Abstracts

Introduction. The article substantiates the relevance of achieving individual educational results by students on the basis of modern approaches to their assessment; formulated proposals for improving the technology of multi-level education; a description of practical experience in the development and use of assessment materials based on a variable typology of tasks and their indices in a weighted average assessment system is presented. The purpose of the article is to substantiate and reveal an updated approach to multi-level education based on a weighted average assessment system as a condition that ensures the individualization of education.

Materials and methods. The main research methods are the analysis of scientific literature devoted to the problem of differentiated learning, approaches to the development of multi-level tasks, features of the weighted average assessment system, the formation of reflective skills among students; as well as diagnostic methods, including observation, description, conversation, questioning, pedagogical experiment, methods of statistical data processing.

Results. Proposals have been developed for the implementation of a multi-level approach based on a weighted average assessment system, contributing to the creation of conditions for the individualization of education, the achievement of individual educational results by students; a description of the typology of differentiation and the procedure for developing multi-level tasks is presented; examples of tasks for various subjects are given.

Discussion. It is emphasized that the effectiveness of the project is to ensure the individualization of education with the possibility for students to choose both the content and the method of education; formation and development of reflective skills in students. It is noted that the proposed variant of assessment of multi-level education is used in combination with other assessment procedures. The conditions for the successful application of technology are listed: systemic use, a variety of learning environments, a change in the role of a subject teacher, the inclusion of parental potential. Emphasis is placed on the need for further development of the research in the direction of work on the formation of the subjective position of students.

Conclusion. It is concluded that the implementation of innovative functional educational practice will contribute to the achievement of individual educational results by students, which means ensuring the objectivity of the internal system for assessing the quality of education in a general education organization. At the same time, conditions are indicated that will ensure the full achievement of the result. Providing the opportunity to choose should alternate with the actual independent educational activity of the student. A prerequisite for individualization is systematic work on the formation and development of students' abilities for introspection, self-assessment, self-determination.

Keywords

Individualization of education; Individual educational results; Multilevel approach; Evaluation system; Weighted average scoring system; Objectivity of evaluation; Internal system for assessing the quality of education

Highlights

The relevance of individualization in the modern education system is substantiated;

The main advantages and disadvantages of traditional multi-level education are analyzed, proposals are made for its improvement;

Proposed approaches to the development of multi-level tasks based on the differentiation of content in accordance with the current federal state standards of general education;

The results of practice on the application of multi-level tasks are presented.

REFERENCES

1. Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta nachal'nogo obshchego obrazovaniya: prikaz Ministerstva prosveshcheniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.05.2021 № 286 (redaktsiya ot 18.07.2022) [On approval of the federal state educational standard for primary general education: order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation of May 31, 2021 No. 286 (as amended on July 18, 2022)], Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/607175842 (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

2. Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya: prikaz Ministerstva prosveshcheniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 31.05.2021 № 287 (redaktsiya ot 18.07.2022) [On approval of the federal state educational standard for main general education: order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation of May 31, 2021 No. 287 (as amended on July 18, 2022)], Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/607175848 (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

3. O vnesenii izmeneniy v prikaz Ministerstva obrazovaniya i nauki Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 17 maya 2012 g. No. 413 “Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo standarta srednego (pol-nogo) obshchego obrazovaniya” : prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 29.12.2014 № 1645 (redaktsiya ot 12.05.2022) [On amendments to the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of May 17, 2012 No. 413 “On approval of the federal state educational standard of secondary (full) general education”: Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 1645 of December 29, 2014 (as amended on May 12, 2022)], Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902350579 (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

4. Frumin I., Dobryakova M., Remorenko I. (2018), Universal'nyye kompetentnosti i novaya gramotnost' [Universal competencies and new literacy], Uchitel'skaya gazeta, 30, Available at: https://ug.ru/universalnye-kompetentnosti-i-novaya-gramotnost-chemu-uchit-segodnya-dlya-uspeha-zavtra-2/ (Accessed: 15.10.2022). (In Russian).

5. Bayborodova L.V., Burlakova T.V. (2015), Individualizatsiya obrazovatel'nogo protsessa, [Individualization of the educational process], Forum Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni K. D. Ushinskogo, pp. 11–19. Available at: https://forum.yspu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Bajborodova-Burlakova.pdf (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

6. Makarenko G.I., Kryukova N.V. (2021), Pedagogicheskiy aspekt individualizatsii v professional'noy podgotovke magistrov kak faktor innovatsionnoy strategii obucheniya [Pedagogical aspect of individualization in professional training of masters as a factor of innovative teaching strategy], Vestnik Mariyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3 (43), Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pedagogicheskiy-aspekt-individualizatsii-v-professionalnoy-podgotovke-magistrov-kak-faktor-innovatsionnoy-strategii-obucheniya (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

7. Poladova V.V. (2019), Kratkiy obzor pedagogicheskikh tekhnologiy (v pomoshch' molodomu uchitelyu matematiki) [A Brief Review of Pedagogical Technologies (To Help a Young Mathematics Teacher)], Yevropeyskaya nauka, № 43-2 (43), Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kratkiy-obzor-pedagogicheskih-tehnologiy-v-pomosch-molodomu-uchitelyu-matematiki (Accessed: 15.10.2022). (In Russian).

8. Klimbey L.V. (2019), Raznourovnevoye i differentsirovannoye obucheniye, kak faktor povysheniya kachestva obucheniya [Multi-level and differentiated learning as a factor in improving the quality of education], World science: problems and innovations, Nauka i Prosveshcheniye (Individual'nyy predprinimatel' “Gulyayev G.YU.”), Penza, May 30, 2019, pp. 102–104. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=37638074 (Accessed: 15.10.2022). (In Russian).

9. Zayavka na prisvoyeniye statusa federal'noy innovatsionnoy ploshchadki. Munitsipal'noye byudzhetnoye obshcheobrazovatel'noye uchrezhdeniye «Gimnaziya № 1 goroda Chelyabinska». (2021) [Application for the status of a federal innovation platform. Municipal budgetary educational institution "Gymnasium No. 1 of Chelyabinsk"], Informatsionnaya sistema soprovozhdeniya deyatel'nosti federal'nykh innovatsionnykh ploshchadok, Available at: https://fip.expert/project/2089/show (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

10. Avtomatizirovannaya informatsionnaya sistema «Setevoy gorod. Obrazovaniye». Rukovodstvo pol'zovatelya. Dlya obshcheobrazovatel'nykh organizatsiy. V 3.0. Zakrytoye aktsionernoye obshchestvo «Innovatsionnyye resheniya i tekhnologii dlya sfery obrazovaniya». (2022), [Automated information system “Network city. Education“. User's manual. For educational organizations. V 3.0. Innovative solutions and technologies for education. Closed Joint Stock Company], Available at: https://rcokio.ru/files/upload/sgo/rukovodstvo_ac_sgo_3_0.pdf (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

11. Timerkhanov D.G., Katsay I.I., Grebneva Yu.A. (2021), Tekhnologiya raznourovnevogo obucheniya na osnove srednevzveshennoy sistemy otsenivaniya [Technology of multi-level education based on the weighted average system of assessment], Nauchno-metodicheskoye obespecheniye otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya. Regional'nyy tsentr otsenki kachestva i informatizatsii obrazovaniya, 3 (4), 35-42. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47505136 (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

12. Il'ina S.P., Tsimmerman N. V. (2020), Razvitiye idei individualizatsii obrazovaniya kak istoricheskaya predposylka personifitsirovannogo obucheniya [Development of the idea of individualization of education as a historical prerequisite for personalized learning], Chelovek i obrazovaniye, 4 (65), 52–62. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/razvitie-idei-individualizatsii-obrazovaniya-kak-istoricheskaya-predposylka-personifitsirovannogo-obucheniya (Accessed: 16.10.2022). (In Russian).

13. Smirnova I.A. (2020), Osobennosti organizatsii samostoyatel'noy raboty studentov po distsipline «Metodika prepodavaniya russkogo yazyka i literatury» [Features of the organization of independent work of students in the discipline "Methods of teaching the Russian language and literature"], Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (97), 251–260. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osobennosti-organizatsii-samostoyatelnoy-raboty-studentov-po-distsipline-metodika-prepodavaniya-russkogo-yazyka-i-literatury (Accessed: 16.10.2022). (In Russian).

14. Yandex.Textbook (2020), Stavim tseli v obrazovanii: taksonomiya Bluma [Setting goals in education: Bloom's taxonomy], Available at: https://teacher.yandex.ru/posts/stavim-tseli-v-obrazovanii-taksonomiya-bluma (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).

15. Burlakova T.V. (2008), Individualizatsiya professional'noy podgotovki studentov v pedagogicheskom vuze: kontseptual'nyye osnovy [Individualization of professional training of students in a pedagogical university: conceptual foundations], Shuya: Federal'noye gosudarstvennoye byudzhetnoye obrazovatel'noye uchrezhdeniye vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya “Shuyskiy gosudarstvennyy pedagogicheskiy universitet”, 179 p. Available at: https://rucont.ru/efd/532715 (Accessed: 01.10.2022). (In Russian).